Actually if you have DD-WRT its a piece of cake. I suggest it to any user
who has a home router which is dd-wrt compatible.
The benefits go well beyond the scope of this thread, but don't be
intimidated. Most VPN providers support dd-wrt.

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Keith Vassallo <[email protected]> wrote:

> Agreed.
>
>
> Though its not so easy to setup a VPN, as well as rules to route DNS
> traffic to it. At least for the average user.
>
> K
>
> On 23 May 2012, at 10:49, Raphael Borg Ellul Vincenti wrote:
>
> Best thing I can suggest is running the DNS traffic over a VPN and hosting
> a local DNS caching server on your network
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Anton Xuereb <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> that still wouldn't work as they simple capture all traffic on port 53
>> and redirect transparently to their own servers
>>
>>
>> On 23 May 2012 10:37, Keith Vassallo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I personally stopped using GO a long time ago, and can proudly say that
>>> my house has NONE of GO's services... not even a fixed line.
>>>
>>> Melita does not have this problem. Yet. Remember that by blocking
>>> trackers and bittorrent, they're not just bowing the IP holders, but more
>>> importantly for them they're hugely reducing the amount of bandwidth they
>>> need.
>>>
>>> I can't test this at home, because I'm on Melita, however...
>>>
>>> Does GO have domains to point to its DNS servers, or just as IP? In the
>>> latter case you could modify your local hosts file to make the domain
>>> resolve to Google's DNS servers, or OpenDNS or something similar.
>>>
>>> K
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23 May 2012, at 09:57, Anton Xuereb wrote:
>>>
>>> glad to have helped. P.S. Their 25mbit fibre with 1.5mbit upload is
>>> deeeeeeeeliciousss
>>>
>>> On 23 May 2012 09:55, Ramon Casha <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I suspect that the nefarious role was the intended effect. Thanks for
>>>> telling me about Melita. I'll probably switch everything over pretty soon.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ramon Casha
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 23 May 2012 09:14, Anton Xuereb <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'v been aware of this setup for quite some time now. Afaik the
>>>>> initial reason for this setup was that since they bought so many
>>>>> competitors, they resolved to this tactic instead of having to contact all
>>>>> their customers to change DNS settings. Ofcourse, this setup seems to now
>>>>> have taken a more nefarious role.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23 May 2012 09:10, Paul Morley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  Yes that has happen to me a few times,
>>>>>> I think their spam filtering zaps the message but unfortunately it
>>>>>> does not tell the sender the email has been block and and not sent also 
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> doesn't tell the receiver that the message was blocked, so he will never
>>>>>> know a message was sent in the first place...!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05/23/2012 06:27 AM, Daniel wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From my experience with Melita....I send some particular emails with
>>>>>> attachments and they finish somewhere in cyperspace....there  is NO
>>>>>> acknowledgement that the email has been withheld (for any medieval reason
>>>>>> maybe!!) for the sender and neither to the receiver!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23/05/12 06:03, Ramon Casha wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20120521/letters/Internet-privacy.420660
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ramon Casha
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> MLUG-list mailing 
>>>>>> [email protected]http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> MLUG-list mailing 
>>>>>> [email protected]http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MLUG-list mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MLUG-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> MLUG-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MLUG-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>
>
_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list

Reply via email to