On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 04:19:06PM -0400, Jimmy wrote: > > Methinks that LAMP will be turning into LAPP > > <flaimbait> > Postgresql is superior in every way to mysql. > Don't know why anyone would even still use mysql anyways... > </flaimbait>
<spellingflame> You spelled flame wrong! </spellingflame> Oh and vim is better than emacs *ducks and runs* > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Chris O'Regan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I guess some group will fork mysql to another product and it will > >> assume another name. > > > > Methinks that LAMP will be turning into LAPP if this deal goes > > through. I don't see why Oracle would want to continue development of > > a competing database product that can be used for free. > > > >> And the Sun File Systems, that are interesting in their own way, what > >> about their being ported to Linux? > > > > It depends. There was a time when Oracle was talking about building > > their own Linux distro (well, re-branding RHEL) so that they could > > sell database appliances. Will they scrap that in favour of an > > Oracle/Sun appliance? I don't see much incentive in them investing in > > Linux now. -- Mark http://www.lambic.co.uk
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ mlug mailing list [email protected] https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca
