Hi all, I am agree with you JF about Vmware esx is very excellent and with all the tool for an enterprise stack its the best...
I dont know OpenVZ but I know Virtualbox, its my second choice very good engine. I never use Xen so no opignion on it of coarse some of my customer would likr to have an only M$WD$ solution and we have M$virtualserver2005 not very good and if you compare it , Vmware is the best... I work with virtualisation since 2001, the only soft with no problem is Vmware. I dont have any stock from them but after years, i can sleep... Regards Phil Jean-Francois Theroux a écrit : > 1. If you're going to use VMware, forget about the server edition. > It's a utter POS performance wise. ESX/ESXi is very performant and is > the only good option for enterprises stacks. > > 2. If you need only to virtualize Linux, then you can't get better > performance than with OpenVZ. I manage thousands of VEs on it daily > and it's a really good product. It's future is uncertain though, as > there's not been any commits on it for months now. > > 3. Xen, well, I was never fond of it, so I can't really tell. > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:34 AM, patricia campbell > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I'm testing a few VM apps & OSes on an old server ram do any of you > have opinions on > > Virtualbox / VMware / Citrix / Xen .... > > > Silly question really I know you have opinions from past experience > ;-) may I hear some svp ?? > > (Has anyone tried VMware ESX on older boxen ?? ex: 32bit Xeon > 2.4GHz 4GB ram > > -- > ___..____._..___._..___. > ...|...|___/..|..|......|..|___| > ...|...|.....\..|..|___.|..|.....| > > "I am always doing what I cannot do yet in order to learn how to do > it." -Vincent Van Gogh > _______________________________________________ mlug mailing list [email protected] https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca
