XFCE4 and openbox on slower computers here. Pretty much for the same reasons as has been said before, they get out of the way, they are fast, stable and do not require a humongous ammount of dependencies.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Ravnox <[email protected]> wrote: > I was a big fan of XFCE when I was using Slackware years ago. While I > wanted to like and use KDE, it was just too buggy for me. XFCE was so > fast and stable but KDE got better and I moved on to it. (I never > liked Gnome) > > XFCE went well with the Slackware style of hacking everything to make > it run like you want to. I just had enough of doing so much manual > configuration and compiling so many applications not packaged with > Slackware... Kubuntu forever now! ;) (Though I use Debian for servers) > > -- > Ravnox > > Quoting patricia campbell <[email protected]>: > > > At the risk of starting a holy war what are the preferred desktop > > environments out there in mlug-land & why. > > > > XFCE4 is mine light weight & uncluttered > > KDE > > Gnome > > > > other ? > > > > -- > > ___..____._..___._..___. > > ...|...|___/..|..|......|..|___| > > ...|...|.....\..|..|___.|..|.....| > > > > "I am always doing what I cannot do yet in order to learn how to do > > it." -Vincent Van Gogh > > > > > _______________________________________________ > mlug mailing list > [email protected] > https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca > -- David Pelletier http://spareminds.org
_______________________________________________ mlug mailing list [email protected] https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca
