concepts wrote: >> ..and a camera uses film, not a digital sensor. Wait, no it uses >> > > Jemery, you have totally avoided any use of logic. The phone's purpose and use > is not altered and you should then have also made the same retrograde comments > going back to bark megaphones... > Replacing a sensor and replacing a battery are two entirely different things > and you were being obtuse to say the least and know it! > As for dear old Ansel, I'd show him a D3x and its resulting images which would > surpass what he used... Or I could just show him an 8×10 digital camera > scanner that out-perform his wildest dreams. Not as fast as his view camera, > but just as portable in not lighter. > So next time, try at least to keep it real. > > Andre Adnre, you busted me! Ansel _would_ have to bow down to our superior technology. I mean, imagine he had access to that! He could have snapped 400 shots of the same guy in a few minutes and just picked the best one rather than painstakingly composing every shot and using the art of photography to capture his subjects.
The other day I was at the phone store and they had this "wireless" phone. I whipped out my 15 foot phone extension cord and exclaimed "why would i need that?". Phones have cords people! Things change whether we like it or not. It is not logical to think that convergence and advancing technology is bad or will not happen. What you are comfortable with is different than me, and thank Linus above for that or else we'd all be using the same devices and probably all look the same too. I like the saying "the best camera is the one you have with you". Keepin' it real, Jeremy _______________________________________________ mlug mailing list [email protected] https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca
