If anyone wants to test ipv6 and cannot get something from their ISP,
you can get a tunnel

options:

sixxs.net, my favorite, stable for me for the last 4+ years
freenet6.net
tunnelbroker.net, extremely fast, but requires a static IP, no client
needed either

i have setup my home net to use ipv6 only, and using a combination of
totd and NAT-PT (http://tomicki.net/naptd.download.php) to provide
access to ipv4

let me know if anyone needs help

-nick

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Patrick McLean <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/02/11 09:48 PM, Jeremy wrote:
>> On 11-02-10 09:43 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 05:21:17PM -0800, Leslie S Satenstein wrote:
>>>> Hi Hendrik
>>>> What about all the routers out there?  Would not the ISP do the
>>>> translation from ipv6 to ipv4 for you? And yes, you should still have
>>>> your static ip address.
>>>
>>> That would have been nice.  But I gather some of the higher-level
>>> protocols are different, using pecific features of IPv6, and protocol
>>> translation may not be trivial.  That said, it's probably somewhat
>>> feasible to so a somewhat decent job.  The basic problem is that the
>>> IPv6 inventors had not planned interoperability between IPv4 and
>>> IPv6.  They had some idea that everyone would gradually acquire
>>> dual-stack systems that could operate in both modes.  But in real-life
>>> terms, that hasn't happened.  Oh, countries who were originally
>>> allocated a critical shortage of class A networks have already gone and
>>> done this because they had to.  But North America is a holdout.
>>> And the annoying thing is that most current OS's, such as Windows, OS/X
>>> Macs, Linuxes already are IPv6-capable.  It's the ISPs that are the
>>> bottleneck.
>>>
>>> I actually don't know which routers do IPv6 and which don't.  I suspect
>>> in any case that it's just a firmware change.  If the manufacturer still
>>> suupports that router model, anyway.  Otherwise firmware might be  hard
>>> to come by.
>>>
>>> -- hendrik
>>
>> OpenWRT can do this, and the routers I mentioned a few months back
>> (netgear WNDR3700 and another linux based model) could handle quite alot
>> of traffic load. These routers already run a modified openwrt firmware.
>>
>> I have a few of them, they are very nice and fun, USB port too ;)
>
> Teksavvy has a modified Tomato firmware for Linksys routers that does
> both multilink ppp (bypasses Bell's throttling) and IPv6.
> _______________________________________________
> mlug mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca
>
_______________________________________________
mlug mailing list
[email protected]
https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca

Reply via email to