>> Makes me curious: is that really a separate "distribution" and if so
>> why? I mean, the way I see it, it would make a lot of sense to just
>> create a bunch of Debian bohdi-<foo> packages and publish it as a Debian
>> repository, so you could install a basic Debian system in the usual way,
>> add you repository to /etc/apt/sources.conf, and then install the
>> `bohdi' meta-package. Is that what you've done, and if not, why not?
> This way you can have a livecd with the setup as it will be once installed.
Is that the answer to my question? If so, I don't understand how the
two relate. Could you expand on it? Why do you think that a bohdi made of
just a set of extra packages would prevent such a livecd?
> It is just an ubuntu respin, you don't have to call it another distro if you
> don't want.
I don't know what's a respin.
Stefan
_______________________________________________
mlug mailing list
[email protected]
https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca
