On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Ben Evans < benjamin.john.ev...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 2009/4/10 John Rose <john.r...@sun.com> > >> On Apr 10, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Ben Evans wrote: >> >> ... >> >> BUILD SUCCESSFUL >> Total time: 25 seconds >> gnumake: *** [build] Error 2 >> >> >> Can you say why gnumake is reporting error status 2? Did ant complain >> somewhere? When I try an incremental rebuild, the last output looks >> something like this: >> > > Digging into this, it looks like the failure occurs much earlier - but that > it fails to terminate the build. > > I think the culprit is this section: > > cd bsd_i486_compiler2/product && ./test_gamma > openjdk full version "1.7.0-internal-boxcat_2009_02_01_14_00-b00" > Error occurred during initialization of VM > java/lang/NoClassDefFoundError: java/lang/Object > gnumake[3]: *** [product] Error 1 > gnumake[2]: *** [generic_build2] Error 2 > gnumake[1]: *** [product] Error 2 > *** Exit status 2. > > I'm pretty confident that this is something environmental to my build - > will try and track down and report. After trying several other builds, I can get a clean build providing I start with SoyLatte. However, if I try to use any OpenJDK7 build (including Langdon's binaries from last Summer), no good. It always seems to fail over the Queens.java test. It doesn't always fail with the same message, and the OpenJDK7 builds (including some I made myself) have otherwise worked fine - they're my standard JRE for all of my Eclipse sessions at home, for example, and I haven't had a single failure from them. Has anyone else tried to used an OpenJDK7 environment to build MLVM, rather than SoyLatte? Thanks, Ben
_______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
