On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter < [email protected]> wrote:
> Ben Evans wrote: > > After trying several other builds, I can get a clean build providing I > > start with SoyLatte. > > > > However, if I try to use any OpenJDK7 build (including Langdon's > > binaries from last Summer), no good. It always seems to fail over the > > Queens.java test. It doesn't always fail with the same message, and the > > OpenJDK7 builds (including some I made myself) have otherwise worked > > fine - they're my standard JRE for all of my Eclipse sessions at home, > > for example, and I haven't had a single failure from them. > > > > Has anyone else tried to used an OpenJDK7 environment to build MLVM, > > rather than SoyLatte? > > No, but I did see the Queens.java error come up once and didn't know > why. That could be it. I wonder what the problem is? > > Every time I've gotten a good build, I have always built with SoyLatte. > Just to add my status to this thread, I've now got a solid build using SoyLatte, and have got Remi's examples (from http://weblogs.java.net/blog/forax/archive/2009/01/method_handles.html) up and running in my environment (including inside Eclipse). I've written up my efforts here: http://boxcatjunction.blogspot.com/2009/04/invokedynamic-on-os-x-update.html- but it's mostly just a collation of the various sources I've used for my build. I've also been talking with some people from the Perl world about helping with my toy Perl-like language (which will need to use invokedynamic heavily, if I'm understanding the use case right). I'll put out a blog post with the state of play on that project soon. Still no dice with using OpenJDK7 to build mlvm - if anyone does manage to get it to build on OS X, could they let me / the list know? Thanks, Ben
_______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
