Sorry, I missed this! We've not really been hanging out at JavaOne because of the total logistical failure of having talks spread across several hotels and rescheduling and/or moving most of them the week before the event. I'm really hoping that I can get back to indy stuff in JRuby soon...I guess I've been waiting on ASM, since what I have now still sort-of works and the next step will be to update all the way to the newest stuff.
I'm also looking to explore whether it's possible to get equivalent performance out of Remi's backport if we totally control the code generation and classloading logic (i.e. the way JRuby works right now). We would move straight to indy for everything if that's possible, which would make it a lot more compelling (I'd *love* to just delete all the crap we have to do right now). On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:23 PM, John Rose <[email protected]> wrote: > I am available for conversation about JVM futures (JSR 292 and MLVM) this > afternoon and tomorrow. > > At about 3:30, I will be hanging around the JavaOne tent by the Hilton. RSVP > in case we relocate. > > I'm especially eager to hear people's comments on the JSR 292 work. Much of > it is already in the OpenJDK source base, and will therefore be frozen into > the JDK 7 Reference Implementation in a matter of weeks. This is the time to > make sure we're not leaving out any good design tweaks. > > (Of course, we are leaving out big things like tail call and interface > injection. I'm talking about the details of the method handle API and > invokedynamic design.) > > Current reference draft (which is close to what's in the OpenJDK): > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jrose/pres/indy-javadoc-mlvm/ > > Best wishes, > -- John > _______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev > _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
