Hi, Jochen. I pinged a colleague about this, and here are his comments. Do they help?
— John On Feb 3, 2014, at 7:43 AM, Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org> wrote: > No ideas at all? Begin forwarded message: From: "serguei.spit...@oracle.com" <serguei.spit...@oracle.com> Subject: Re: Fwd: problems with step debugging Date: January 24, 2014 2:47:33 PM PST To: John Rose <john.r.r...@oracle.com> Cc: "serguei.spit...@oracle.com" <serguei.spit...@oracle.com> Hi John, It does not look to be related to 292. They have the problem with the invokestatic bytecode. Also they say that using invokedynamic compiled code step-into works well. They normally setup some stepping filters (org.codehaus.groovy.*, groovy.*, java.*, sun.*, org.apache.*) and also there is some problem with their line number information which could potentially cause this issue. This does not ring any bell for me. The only question is if it has anything to do with the JvmtiHideSingleStepping. The information provided in the bug report is not enough to make any conclusion. The jdk 7 does not have the RedefineClasses+PopFrame support for jsr-292 yet but it does not have anything to do with this issue. Thanks, Serguei
_______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
