thanks for reacting John, now... yes, invokedynmic doesn't have the problem, so it might be a problem with invokestatic.
The problem with the thing simply is, I don't know what bytecode is supposed to be correct or if there is actually a problem with the JVM. I kind of doubt the later, since it doesn't seem to be version related. So if it is a bug, then it would most probably be an old one. If I know how it is supposed to look like, I can change our compiler to emit the line number information exactly where suggested and then see if it works. But for that I missing that information :( bye Jochen Am 03.02.2014 21:10, schrieb John Rose: > Hi, Jochen. I pinged a colleague about this, and here are his comments. > Do they help? > > — John > > On Feb 3, 2014, at 7:43 AM, Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org > <mailto:blackd...@gmx.org>> wrote: > >> No ideas at all? > > Begin forwarded message: > > *From: *"serguei.spit...@oracle.com <mailto:serguei.spit...@oracle.com>" > <serguei.spit...@oracle.com <mailto:serguei.spit...@oracle.com>> > *Subject: **Re: Fwd: problems with step debugging* > *Date: *January 24, 2014 2:47:33 PM PST > *To: *John Rose <john.r.r...@oracle.com <mailto:john.r.r...@oracle.com>> > *Cc: *"serguei.spit...@oracle.com <mailto:serguei.spit...@oracle.com>" > <serguei.spit...@oracle.com <mailto:serguei.spit...@oracle.com>> > > Hi John, > > It does not look to be related to 292. > They have the problem with the invokestatic bytecode. > Also they say that using invokedynamic compiled code step-into works well. > > They normally setup some stepping filters (org.codehaus.groovy.*, > groovy.*, java.**, sun.**, org.apache.*) > and also there is some problem with their line number information which > could potentially cause this issue. > > This does not ring any bell for me. > The only question is if it has anything to do with the > JvmtiHideSingleStepping. > The information provided in the bug report is not enough to make any > conclusion. > > The jdk 7 does not have the RedefineClasses+PopFrame support for jsr-292 yet > but it does not have anything to do with this issue. > > Thanks, > Serguei > > > > _______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev > -- Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou - Groovy Project Tech Lead blog: http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/ german groovy discussion newsgroup: de.comp.lang.misc For Groovy programming sources visit http://groovy-lang.org _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
