On Saturday 06 December 2008 19:44:42 querido wrote: > Part 3: What I have done to my personal copy of mnemosyne > ******************************************************** > I'm not a programmer, so this is only for myself. > (I've disabled the data upload, in case that matters, because my data > must not be valid, since I've changed the algorithm.)
Feel free to *do* upload the data (and tell me perhaps your user id). What matters for the analysis is only the actual intervals, and not by which algorithm they were defined. If it turns out your scheduler results in better performance, that would be a good thing to know. In Mnemosyne 2.0, the updated plugin mechanism will make it much easier for users to swap out the scheduler with a different one, if they so desire. (At the moment, I don't feel like tweaking the default algorithm, as I think that should only be done based on statistical analysis, and there are other priorities) Peter -- ------------------------------------------------ Peter Bienstman Ghent University, Dept. of Information Technology Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, B-9000 Gent, Belgium tel: +32 9 264 34 46, fax: +32 9 264 35 93 WWW: http://photonics.intec.UGent.be email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
