querido, I am also interested in seeing your changes, especially since we don't know when 2.0 will be available.
Jason On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Peter Bienstman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Saturday 06 December 2008 19:44:42 querido wrote: > >> Part 3: What I have done to my personal copy of mnemosyne >> ******************************************************** >> I'm not a programmer, so this is only for myself. >> (I've disabled the data upload, in case that matters, because my data >> must not be valid, since I've changed the algorithm.) > > Feel free to *do* upload the data (and tell me perhaps your user id). What > matters for the analysis is only the actual intervals, and not by which > algorithm they were defined. If it turns out your scheduler results in better > performance, that would be a good thing to know. > > In Mnemosyne 2.0, the updated plugin mechanism will make it much easier for > users to swap out the scheduler with a different one, if they so desire. > > (At the moment, I don't feel like tweaking the default algorithm, as I think > that should only be done based on statistical analysis, and there are other > priorities) > > Peter > > -- > ------------------------------------------------ > Peter Bienstman > Ghent University, Dept. of Information Technology > Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, B-9000 Gent, Belgium > tel: +32 9 264 34 46, fax: +32 9 264 35 93 > WWW: http://photonics.intec.UGent.be > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------ > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
