On Dec 9, 2:53 am, Peter Bienstman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A big speedup could already be gained by switching from the old xml parser
> that was included with Python to one of the more modern variants that comes
> with the python library (Ixml I think, but I don't remember exactly)
>
> Patches welcome!
I'll patch this. I wouldn't have cracked on it as hard as I did if I
weren't planning on it, actually. I tend to think you should only be
really critical of (free) software you are willing to help improve. I
do have a question though. It does sound like the increase in time
with number of items is greater than linear, and if that's the case
there is probably only one spot that needs to be fixed. If this is
inherent in the xml parser you're using I would consider it a bug in
that library, and I would not bother to look for a cause in your code-
I'd just switch in a better library. Do you know that your bottleneck
is in the xml parser?
Thanks
Duncan
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mnemosyne-proj-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
