On Tuesday 09 December 2008 14:00:13 duncan wrote: > I'll patch this. I wouldn't have cracked on it as hard as I did if I > weren't planning on it, actually. I tend to think you should only be > really critical of (free) software you are willing to help improve. I > do have a question though. It does sound like the increase in time > with number of items is greater than linear, and if that's the case > there is probably only one spot that needs to be fixed. If this is > inherent in the xml parser you're using I would consider it a bug in > that library, and I would not bother to look for a cause in your code- > I'd just switch in a better library. Do you know that your bottleneck > is in the xml parser?
Not really, know, although I do know that the current parser we use is the slowest of the lot. Cheers, Peter --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
