2009/5/14 Peter Bienstman <[email protected]>: > Yes. 2.0 uses a sqlite database, which is much better than the format in 1.x > where everything is kept in memory.
>From the very little I know about iPhone apps at the moment, they use/support sqlite too! :) >> In either case, if I was to think about working on an iPhone native >> app, I'd take a look and see what's being done in 2.x first. I think >> that the iPhone app would still be useful with a limited set of >> features - review + sync only at first, > > Absolutely. That's the same path I'm taking for the WM client. Yeah. I'd be targeting my own use case really, which is wanting to use Mnemosyne on the train. Being able to just review what's scheduled (and not even have the scheduling algorithm implemented at all, just act as a review+sync tool) in itself is a lot better than nothing. After that, review with scheduling (so it knows what to review, no just a dumb review tool) + sync and finally card management might make a good three release plan :) Robert --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
