>> I've also contacted Damien from Anki, but he does not seem to be too >> interested... >> (http://groups.google.com/group/ankisrs/browse_thread/thread/410997e06be22302). >> > We can start from looking at Anki's implementation. If it's good > enough and only requires a bit of changes then > we can use it and Damien might be more interested in joining us. > Anyway it makes sense to look at working implementation first in > order to not reinvent the wheel.
The bulk of it was written over a year ago, so I'm sure there's plenty of room for improvement. One thing I need to tackle is the initial sync or a full update - it performs quite well for daily syncs, but a full sync on a deck of 30,000 cards takes up a large amount of memory, unpacking the JSON into a python object tree. I will probably address this by sending across the compressed deck verbatim, instead of bundling it up into a sync message. Of course, this approach would never be compatible with other implementations. An alternative would be an incremental JSON parser, but that may be complicated to implement. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
