On Monday 29 June 2009 05:04:29 am Eric Kjellman wrote: > However it seems like, looking at the code and watching what happens > to the interval numbers, if I have recently "relearned" a card (say > marking it from 0 to 2), and finish all the cards, then learn ahead, > and mark the same card 2 again, it will set it to be ~6 days ahead. > > But there's no way I'm going to remember that card in 6 days. I barely > am remembering it 20 minutes later.
If that is the case, you should never have graded the card 2 in the first place. Grade 2 has as tooltip "I remember this card now, and will probably remember it in a few days" > Is there a way to > review cards without the intervals being greatly changed, other than > backing up my database and reimporting it? 2.0 has a cramming scheduler, which does exactly that. It does go against the grain of the spaced repetition philosophy, though. > Or should I only be reviewing cards once a day? You can obviously split you day's workload over several sessions in a day. I would do at least one repetition per day, and not overuse 'learn ahead'. > Finally, if I were to tinker with the code to change this behavior, > should I stop the program from sending logs? No problem. You can however change the ID string Mnemosyne sends, e.g. 1.2.1- eric Cheers, Peter --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
