On Monday 07 September 2009 03:46:50 am Ben wrote:
> I was curious about this so I did a bit of googling myself.  Check
> out:
>
> http://civicrm.org/node/166
>
> There's a bit on the AGPL that supposedly was prepared by the Software
> Freedom Law Center:
>
>     CiviCRM is designed to be a stand-alone application that can
>     communicate with other applications via a defined and published
>     application programming interface (API). If you do not make
>     modifications to CiviCRM files, but instead distribute it along
>     side another application that utilizes the CiviCRM functionality
>     only through its API, CiviCRM will remain a separate and
>     independent program from the other application. This means that,
>     although you must of course still comply with the AGPL with
>     respect to CiviCRM, your distribution of the other separate and
>     independent program is not governed by the AGPL.
>
> So apparently the criterion is whether or not the AGPL'd software is
> being operated through its intended interface.  To me (IANAL) that
> means that Chinesepod or whoever would not have to open source all
> their web code just because they were allowing their users to run
> Mnemosyne.  However, if they made any modifications, or interacted
> with (lib)mnemosyne other than through your API, they would have to
> AGPL that code.

Interesting! However, wouldn't that mean that any new front-end people write 
(and which only interacts with libmnemosyne through the API) would not be 
subject to the AGPL? So even with the AGPL, people could write a new client 
(Javascript, Android, whatever, ...) and keep it secret?

Would that also apply for the GPL? I guess not, because otherwise what's the 
point?

Peter

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mnemosyne-proj-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to