On Sep 5, 1:24 pm, Peter Bienstman <[email protected]> wrote: > What I don't know is e.g. if you would rut Mnemosyne together as a component > of a bigger site like Chinesepod, e.g.. Would the Affero licence then require > all of the Chinesepod code to become publicly available? I don't want to go > that far.
I think it would. But I think website developers would also stay away from the current GPL code if it would be integrated into site and not just available on a separate URL. In the case of Mnemosyne you probably want to have integration in order to add value. If you want to stimulate people to use the code for websites and other application, make libmnemosyne LGPL and the GUI frontends GPL. Don't make the license even more restrictive, it will not foster innovation and it's not that hard to reimplement the algorithm. I would support relicensing under the LGPL. If other contributors feel strongly about a change to AGPL I will not object, but I don't think it's the best option. Cheers, Konrad --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
