OK, thank you. Mirek On 24 lis, 01:03, Gwern Branwen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:27 PM, mirek.7 <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, I am new to this group and also I am new user > > of mnemosyne program v. 1.2.1. > > > I like it very much, but I suggest these 2 ideas: > > > 1) Add possibility of some filtering during editing of all records > > (question+answer) in database, because using only sorting > > is not comfort and if I want to edit some sort of record > > I would like to work with only one subset. > > > For example it will be possible work with category > > like filters (or with "wild characters" (* or ?) > > known from database searching etc. > > You do have search functionality. If you are an advanced user who can > use regexps, then you're advanced enough to either work on the .mem > file directly in your favorite text editor, or export it to XML and so > on. > > > > > > > 2) The idea of categories is nice. It helps > > organize content of one database into more subsets. > > But categories in actual form forces us > > to organize vocabulares (if I use mnemosyne for > > learning of foreign lanuage) ONLY in hierarchical manner. > > Because we have to work with only ONE category > > for every record (question + answer). > > > But I think that it will be nice if user could add to every > > record (Question+Answer) not only ONE category, > > but MORE categories. Or introduce some other terminology > > (FACES etc), because we can use the same set of records > > from MULTIPLE views. > > > Thanks. > > > Mirek > > Sounds like tags. That's promised for 2.x (as usual). > > -- > gwern– Skrýt citovaný text – > > – Zobrazit citovaný text –
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
