Hi Robin,

(I took the liberty of copying this message to our discussion forum at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en, where perhaps more 
people can chime in with comments.)

As for your poem question, the very first showing of new cards can either be in 
the order that they were added, or in random order. There is an option for 
that in the configuration screen. 

I personally would not memorise poems using Mnemosyne, as the main reason for 
memorising a poem would be able to recite it from front to back, and not being 
able to say line 21 after you see line 20. However, I know some people who use 
Mnemosyne to memorise poems, and they do seem to like it.

You are right that Mmemosyne (and other similar programs) are mainly useful 
for learning factual information, and not skills. However, it can supplement 
the learning of skills if there is a certain amount of memorisation required.

So for your specific case of bridge, I would keep on improving your bridge 
skills through playing, reading books, or whatever, and once you've got the 
insight to distill a little 'rule' from that (like when it's OK to open with 3 
clubs), you add it to Mnemosyne to make sure that you don't forget.

Distilling this set of rules would indeed be a mammoth task, but so would 
learning to play bridge in the more traditional way, I guess. Once you create 
such a deck, you could in theory share it with other people, but they probably 
will not be able to pick up the 'insight' you got from playing by just 
memorising the rule without context.

There are plenty of premade decks on our site, but I think for the learning 
process (especially the 'insight' phase) it's always a good idea to create 
your own deck from scratch.

The only exception might be premade decks which cover vocabulary from a 
specific course, which is useful as a starting point.

Hopefully this answers some of your questions!

Thanks for the feedback,

Peter

On Wednesday, August 11, 2010 06:24:41 am Patrick Kenny wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:45 +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> > Robin sent a message using the contact form at
> > http://www.mnemosyne-proj.org/contact.
> > 
> > This is feedback.
> > 
> > I was attracted to this application by an article in the press:
> >   http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/aug/07/change-your-life-mem
> >   ory-burkeman
> > 
> > (This article is about SuperMemo, but Wikipedia led me to your site as an
> > alternative.)
> > 
> > My problem is, after trying your program out for a short while, that I
> > can
> > only see it as useful for memorising lists of facts (e.g. the dates of US
> > Presidents).  WHat I had hoped was that it might be useful for memorising
> > two
> > categories of material in my own life: poems, and 'useful tips for
> > playing
> > contract bridge'.
> > 
> > For the first use I tried breaking a long poem into couplets and putting
> > two
> > lines in as a question, and the next two lines as the answer.  By linking
> > pairs of lines over a long set of questions I hoped would get help with
> > memorising the whole poem.
> > 
> > The obstacle to this is that your card decks cannot (so far as I can see)
> > be
> > ordered.  SO the fragments of poem come at you in haphazard order and the
> > thread (the structure) of the poet's thought is lost.
> > 
> > I can't see a way round this.  Putting the poem's first line as a
> > question
> > and the rest of the poem as an answer would just be silly.
> > 
> > Am I missing something?
> > 
> > On the second kind of use - learning to play better bridge - things seem
> > even
> > more problematic.  What I had envisioned was putting in a series of
> > questions
> > like "When is it OK to open with three clubs?" and answering with some
> > short
> > notes about how many points you need, the balance of the hand, etc.  But
> > this
> > would be a mammoth task.  Getting a good set of questions and answers
> > would
> > require me to already have precisely that understanding of bridge play
> > that I
> > am trying to develop.
> > 
> > SO, two thoughts:
> > 
> > 1)  AM I missing the point?  Does you tool have features I have missed or
> > is
> > it really only suitable for memorising long lists of facts?  (I admit
> > that in
> > exam situations - in some study areas - this would be a very useful
> > tool.)
> > 
> > 2)  Will your product only really take off when there are large decks of
> > cards, prepared by skilled experts, covering a range of topics?  However
> > clever and well-founded the system is, how do you reach a critical mass
> > of
> > content as opposed to mere method?
> > 
> > In friendship,
> > Robin Wilson.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mnemosyne-proj-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to