Thanks a ton Peter! I'll be digging into the data shortly. If you're aware of any ongoing analysis efforts, please let me know. I've been trolling the forums and watching conferences and journals for any work on this, but I haven't seen anyone publishing analyses of Mnemosyne data.
Have a great day! -Matt On Dec 9, 10:03 am, Peter Bienstman <peter.bienst...@ugent.be> wrote: > BTW, in the current 2.0 codebase, there is code to parse these log > entries and write the results to an sql database (libmnemosyne/ > file_formats/science_log_parser and science_server/parse_logs), which > could be useful :-) > > > For instance, when "database" is mentioned, three numbers follow. > > Example: 2010-12-09 08:00:09 : Loaded database 2 0 10 > > It seems that the "2" reflects the number of cards scheduled, the "0" > > reflects the number of cards not yet learned, and the "10" is the > > total deck size. > > Yep. > > > Lastly, there are two pairs of numbers, and then a number that seems > > to range from 0 to very high (I've seen 8903.6 on just the first log I > > looked at). Here's where I'm getting really confused. > > They are: scheduled interval, actual interval (could be different from > scheduled interval if you review early or late), new interval, noise > (random scheduling fudge factor), thinking time in seconds. > > Hope this helps, > > Peter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to mnemosyne-proj-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mnemosyne-proj-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
