On Friday, February 04, 2011 02:00:35 pm Michael Campbell wrote: > This would be more trouble than it's worth for me, just due to the large > and disparate set of categories I have. I usually do them in sets, so an > alternate solution would be to have some functionality to HAVE "sets" of > categories that you could turn on and off indepedently, and independent of > the categories themselves. (I'd rather not have to re-categorize things > just to get them in the order/groups I want, but that's another solution I > guess.)
This is exactly what is implemented in 2.0 (as opposed to priorities for categories) Peterr -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
