Thanks for your reply. I suppose i was surprised as I do not recall the
spacing  for a good study period being 1 day, 6 day gap then 15 day gap so
was curious if this write-up accurately reflected the algorithm in use - my
experience was that words were repeated more frequently than this, although
the realiity is I have not made an accurate tracking of spacings.

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:42 PM, GERSAPA <[email protected]> wrote:

> > when I
> > would have expected a period of maybe 3 days. I would very much
> > appreciate peoples thoughts on this, as it doesn't seem to make sense.
>
> Why would you expect this 3 day period? Why It doesn't make sense?
>
> The memory intervals used in SM2 algorithm, according to the author,
> were used based on small studies he made on Q&A pairs, so he found out
> how long would the second interval be necessary in order to remember
> with 10% forgetting probability. With was not made on some empirical
> assumption. Later, the author, Dr. Wosniak, would test out if the
> intervals were indeed correct. I would argue that this intervals are
> the best for any kind of information, I would even argue the whole
> spaced repetition theory. But what I can`t argue is if there is a more
> efficient way to test and maintain previously learned material.
>
> I'd like to see what you think about this, and why specially know if
> you are interested in some kind of research concerning this type of
> spacing algorithms?
>
>
>
> Germán Salízar Pareja
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 15:57, MemoryResearcher
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I was looking at the workings of the old SM2 algorithm (http://
> > www.supermemo.com/english/ol/sm2.htm) and surprised that after the
> > second day of revision, it set the revision period as 6 days - when I
> > would have expected a period of maybe 3 days. I would very much
> > appreciate peoples thoughts on this, as it doesn't seem to make sense.
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "mnemosyne-proj-users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mnemosyne-proj-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to