Certainly closer, but my goal was to have a "mini-algorithm" in the cramming module separate from the main algorithm, whose results are only saved/used during that session. That is, if I miss something, it should "know" I missed it and show me that card again, within the same cramming session. Kind of like a full algorithm in microcosm, that resets every time I start the program.
Others might have different wants of course, but my use was not to keep the results of one cram session from that to the next; it could all start at zero each time, but I want the cards doled out to me either randomly (if I haven't answered yet), or in order of most mistakes made on that card. Each "right" answer wipes out a "wrong" answer for the counting. That type of thing. On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Peter Bienstman <[email protected]> wrote: > What I can do is add some configuration option to the cramming plugin > dealing with the order in which the card are shown, like 'random', 'first > due first', etc.. > > Cheers, > > Peter > > > Quoting Michael Campbell <[email protected]>: > >> I was wondering if anyone could (or was) working on something between >> the cramming plugin and the normal learning cycle. >> >> What I'm looking for is something that (like cramming) doesn't record >> or change the normal "when you see it next" algorithm, but (like >> normal) still presents the cards to you in a particular order; and you >> see the ones you miss more often (and sometimes before) the other ones >> that you don't. I realize this could get to a situation where you >> don't see SOME cards, given a finite amount of cramming time, but it >> would show you how many you haven't seen yet, so you'd know. >> >> I guess this would be like starting with a fresh deck with no learning >> data, and scheduling like normal, but instead of using "in X days", it >> just stores that number as a way to sort them. Something like would >> happen if you started with a new deck, and just kept on going with >> "learn ahead of schedule", ad infinitum. >> >> Is such a thing possible? (Or am I overlooking somethign that would >> make this a horrible idea?) >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
