For me the cramming session could be improved in this way: - A button to click that brings up dialogue: "Not yet memorised in cramming session: xx ( the number) cards. Add tag: _____ (input-field)" - E.g. next day I would cram the tagged subset, after a while tag a new subset of "not yet memorised" etc (After cramming I would probably choose to delete these subset-tags, but the last subsets would also give me valuable input about what knowledge areas that present me the greatest learning challenges. I could then add relevant cards in these areas) / Henrik
On Saturday, 13 October 2012 13:31:01 UTC+2, Michael wrote: > > Certainly closer, but my goal was to have a "mini-algorithm" in the > cramming module separate from the main algorithm, whose results are > only saved/used during that session. That is, if I miss something, it > should "know" I missed it and show me that card again, within the same > cramming session. Kind of like a full algorithm in microcosm, that > resets every time I start the program. > > Others might have different wants of course, but my use was not to > keep the results of one cram session from that to the next; it could > all start at zero each time, but I want the cards doled out to me > either randomly (if I haven't answered yet), or in order of most > mistakes made on that card. Each "right" answer wipes out a "wrong" > answer for the counting. That type of thing. > > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Peter Bienstman > <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > > What I can do is add some configuration option to the cramming plugin > > dealing with the order in which the card are shown, like 'random', > 'first > > due first', etc.. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Peter > > > > > > Quoting Michael Campbell <[email protected] <javascript:>>: > > > >> I was wondering if anyone could (or was) working on something between > >> the cramming plugin and the normal learning cycle. > >> > >> What I'm looking for is something that (like cramming) doesn't record > >> or change the normal "when you see it next" algorithm, but (like > >> normal) still presents the cards to you in a particular order; and you > >> see the ones you miss more often (and sometimes before) the other ones > >> that you don't. I realize this could get to a situation where you > >> don't see SOME cards, given a finite amount of cramming time, but it > >> would show you how many you haven't seen yet, so you'd know. > >> > >> I guess this would be like starting with a fresh deck with no learning > >> data, and scheduling like normal, but instead of using "in X days", it > >> just stores that number as a way to sort them. Something like would > >> happen if you started with a new deck, and just kept on going with > >> "learn ahead of schedule", ad infinitum. > >> > >> Is such a thing possible? (Or am I overlooking somethign that would > >> make this a horrible idea?) > >> > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. > > To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected]<javascript:>. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] <javascript:>. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mnemosyne-proj-users/-/_FHDKQhTeQoJ. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
