Just go to the Ctrl-D screen (De)activate cards. Then pick a subset of your total tags you want to study with the checkboxes.
Then click "Save this set for later use", and name it. (You can use a name you've already used if you like.) You can do this as many times as you like, and doing so will mark JUST those cards as "active". I have a few different sets for various reasons. Some overlap, some don't. But that's totally up to you. On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Ayesha Nicole <[email protected]> wrote: > I am trying to understand what Michael described - because I am wondering if > I should create separate databases for each 'subject/topic' or just create > hierarchical tags - but then how do I review only one subject at a time? is > it done through the 'browse cards' and selecting or de-selecting cards based > on type and tags? > > > On Sunday, October 14, 2012 10:34:51 AM UTC-4, Peter Bienstman wrote: >> >> Actually, I don't consider it a workaround: it's the designed way to >> deal with this :-) >> >> Peter >> >> >> Quoting Michael Campbell <[email protected]>: >> >> > I have this same issue; what I do is create a number of saved "tag >> > sets" in the Ctrl-D dialog each of which captures a "context" of >> > cards. >> > >> > It's not ideal as a workaround, but it does work. >> > >> > On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 6:19 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I haven't seen this request anywhere - I've been using and >> >> recommending Mnemosyne for a couple years, and have 2600 cards now >> >> on a variety of subjects. My problem is that as I'm reviewing, >> >> context switches madly around with each card - I might review one >> >> vocabulary card, then one geography card, then a psychology card, >> >> then review one line from a quote. >> >> >> >> In the Settings dropdown that says "Review memorized cards", can a >> >> third option be added? In addition to "most urgent first" and "in >> >> random order", "order by tag" or "order by primary tag" would be >> >> extremely useful. That way instead of taking an extra second with >> >> each card to determine the context, I could do all my Spanish >> >> review first, then all my "business contacts" review, etc. >> >> >> >> I don't think it would be necessary to select a secondary sort >> >> mechanism - most urgent first would be a fine secondary sort >> >> mechanism. This would just save me a lot of time and effort in >> >> studying when you add up the time I'm spending each day to review >> >> 40-60 cards. >> >> >> >> To the author: Thanks for considering the request, and thanks for >> >> making Mnemosyne - it's become truly indispensable to me! >> >> >> >> Luke Williams >> >> >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mnemosyne-proj-users/-/Q9flG6oKxIcJ. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
