The SuperMemo site had wide ranging papers that go on forever about your 
thoughts and more.  However:  try changing to a system logic that is satisfied 
with taking useful results as a more educated substitute for being right or 
wrong.

On 29 Nov 2012, at 15:25, [email protected] wrote:

> Hello everyone,
> 
> So I have been using Mnemosyne for about 1 1/2 months now. I thought it would 
> be good to help with all the homework and studying I get here in college. I 
> have a question for you and your dog that uses Mnemosyne:
> 
> Is anyone afraid that they aren't playing nice with the algorithm?
> 
> Essentially this: I want to help the algorithm help me. I understand there is 
> a very intelligent algorithm at work here, and I am curious to know if 
> there's a way of using the program that's more right/wrong?
> 
> You could try to use it to make pancakes, but that's obviously not what I'm 
> saying.
> 
> Let me give you an example instead. I open up Mnemosyne, and I go through my 
> daily repetitions. Along the way I encounter a card that I got mostly right, 
> but not entirely right. Is that a 2 or a 4? or neither?
> After I finish my repetitions, I begin to start memorizing new cards. This is 
> where I start to get paranoid.
> See, the way I study is to go over the 15 or so cards that I repeatedly use, 
> over and over, grading them 1 each time, until I feel comfortable that they 
> are properly ingrained in my head.

Critical logic WILL set you in the direction of being paranoid.  "I encounter a 
card that I got mostly right but not entirely."   Change that question from     
"Is that a 2 or a 4 or neither ?"  to  "How can I grade that for the most 
useful timing in subsequent repetitions ?"  Where "How can I grade that ?"  
means for me;  not for the world of Mnemosyne and SuperMemo.


> Am I screwing with the system when I do this? Am I supposed to mark them a 2 
> as soon as I can recite the answer?

The average user is supposed to, yes, and learn to live with the very efficient 
results.

> If anyone involved/knowledgeable in the algorithm could reply, I would be 
> much in gratitude.

Good luck,

George

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mnemosyne-proj-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to