"Internet-Based Spaced Repetition Learning In and Out of the
Classroom: Increasing Independent Student Use", Bailey 2013
http://www.i-repository.net/contents/asia-u/11300207.pdf

> This article presents the results from the second semester of a two-semester 
> project exploring the incorporation a spaced-repetition system (SRS), 
> flashcard computer program, Anki, and its website, into an English as a 
> Foreign Language (EFL) classroom. The overall goal of the project was to 
> teach Japanese university students to be independent users of mobile 
> technology in order to effectively and efficiently learn English. In the 
> first semester, students were introduced to Anki and shown how to use it. At 
> the end of the semester, results showed that student usage of Anki was very 
> low. From an analysis of the first semester of the project (Bailey & Davey, 
> 2011), two possible problem areas were identified: (1) students did not know 
> how to use Anki and therefore could not use it independently; and (2) 
> students did not understand how Anki could help them learn because they had 
> not experienced correct use of the program. For the second semester, 
> solutions were proposed and implemented. Results show that students were able 
> to use Anki independently and correctly, and comparison of usage data from 
> first and second semester showed an overall increase in student usage. 
> Additionally, some results showed a dramatic increase in Anki use, indicating 
> students were using the program outside of the classroom.
>
> ...The horizontal axis represents students, and the vertical axis represents 
> the number of times a student studied a card, a “repetition.” The average 
> number of repetitions per student was 61. Two completed more than 200, and  
> completed zero repetitions. Since this Anki use occurred outside of the 
> classroom, it was not possible to determine where and how the students 
> studied or whether they studied correctly or not.
>
> ...To address the above problems, three solutions were proposed for the 
> second semester.
> Independent Anki use. First, I would teach the students how to create their 
> own Anki user accounts and flashcards from class materials. Second, I would 
> teach them how to access their Anki accounts and study their flashcards. 
> Third, I would teach them how to add new flashcards to their existing deck of 
> flashcards.
> Correct Anki use modeling. As a group, I would regularly and consistently 
> show them how to study with Anki by teacher-modeled use in class, focusing on 
> accurate self-evaluation of answer and providing correct feedback.
>
> ...Materials
> As part of the class content, a new dialog was introduced each week. Each 
> dialog was approximately six to eight lines long with five additional 
> scenarios to practice the dialog structure. From the dialogs, students 
> created flashcards that had a full sentence or question in Japanese on the 
> front and the English translation on the back. From the accompanying 
> scenarios, additional flashcards with key vocabulary were created in the same 
> format. This resulted in approximately 11 to 18 flashcards per week.
>
> ...Independent Anki use: To create more independent users of Anki, the class 
> met in a computer lab once a week. On the first computer lab day, students 
> learned how to access the Anki website on a desktop computer and how to make 
> their own Anki user accounts. In the second week, students learned how to 
> create a new deck and new flashcards from the previous week’s dialog 
> activity. Also, in the second week, during regular class, students learned 
> how to access their Anki website accounts and study their cards on 
> smartphones. In the third week, students learned how to add new cards to 
> their decks. Throughout the rest of the semester, students added new cards on 
> a weekly basis. Students who finished early on those days were encouraged to 
> study their decks. This created an opportunity for additional practice and 
> instruction of correct Anki use.
> Correct Anki use modeling. To increase students' understanding of correct 
> Anki use, correct use was modeled approximately once a week during the 
> semester. The Anki desktop program with a deck of flashcards made from the 
> class materials was displayed on a widescreen television in class. With full 
> class attention, a flashcard with the Japanese language prompt was shown on 
> the screen. A random student was chosen to produce the English equivalent. 
> The student’s answer was written on the board. Other students were called 
> upon to rate the first student’s answer, based on the four options for 
> feedback. The original student was asked for a self-rating. Finally, I gave a 
> rating and explained the rationale behind that rating. This process was 
> repeated for approximately five to ten minutes
> Student-pair Anki use. To increase exposure to correct use of Anki, students 
> participated in pair work once or twice a week. Students logged into their 
> Anki website accounts on a smartphone and passed the device to their partner. 
> This allowed all students to participate, even if they did not own a 
> smartphone. The partner quizzed the first student on their Anki deck by 
> reading the Japanese language prompt. If the first student’s response was 
> correct, the partner pushed the appropriate feedback button. This reduced the 
> problem of students incorrectly rating their own answers. If the response was 
> incorrect, the partner said the correct answer and the first student repeated 
> it. Then, the partner showed the first student the answer on the smartphone 
> and pushed the “again” (incorrect answer) feedback button.
>
> ...As in the earlier chart, the horizontal axis represents students in the 
> same order, and the vertical axis represents the number of times a student 
> studied a card, a “repetition.” From the chart, it is obvious that the usage 
> in the second semester was greater. With a highest usage of 611 repetitions, 
> and a lowest of 92, the average number of repetitions per student was 246 
> compared to 61 from the first semester, an increase of over 400 percent.

Sounds like a major time-investment to get any usage. A 4x increase
when hardly anyone was using it the first time around...?

-- 
gwern
http://www.gwern.net

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mnemosyne-proj-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mnemosyne-proj-users/CAMwO0gzmq_vU6pS6MMCBmGOyuyV4zjZy7RvMDdFyw_Hwgd_45A%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to