+ design-l On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Jon Robson <[email protected]> wrote: > The more I think about it, the more I think, in its current state > mobile should not collapse sections by default. If you really want to > find a lower section, scrolling down the page and being able to > collapse a section to see the next one is easy, yet if you just want > to read the article in its entirety it is annoying to have to click to > expand a section. > > Since we currently load all the HTML for the content of a page it > seems silly to hide it (although we should certainly rethink this if > we ever begin to lazy load sections) > > We ran event logging on toggling a while back [1] and the data showed > as you got down the page, it was less likely a section would be > toggled opened and read. > > I would propose we keep toggling enabled but change the default of all > sections to be open rather than closed. > > This also removes the existing risk of a flash of unstyled content and > enables the ability for users to do find on this page. > > We should at least run some kind of A/B test that rethinks this. > > Thoughts? > > [1] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Event_logging/Mobile#Section_toggles
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
