Just got merged today, playing with it in betalabs. The migration will not be instantaneous though because not every wiki is using CirrusSearch yet which is a prerequisite.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Tomasz Finc <[email protected]> wrote: > And is that migration complete ? > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Max Semenik <[email protected]> > wrote: > > They will be gone with Solr (or its schema, ro be precise). > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Tomasz Finc <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> So are their any technical limitations to experiment with both right > now? > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Jon Robson <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > I'm saying there is use cases for both. > >> > > >> > I would expect a site wide nearby feature to help me discover new > >> > places nearby that I should visit (Wikivoyage even has a 'Go next' > >> > section which does this) > >> > > >> > When I'm in a place, on the page itself I would like to be able to see > >> > map that helps me explore a city and find places to eat. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Max Semenik <[email protected] > > > >> > wrote: > >> >> I imagine that if someone's in London they're much more likely to be > >> >> interested in finding a place to see or to eat at rather than to > find a > >> >> next > >> >> city for their trip. Unless all their touristic goals consist of > >> >> putting > >> >> check marks near city names in a looong list:) > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Jon Robson <[email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> I'm not sure we'd want to bring in secondary points - I can imagine > >> >>> the real use of Special:Nearby on Wikivoyage is for travellers who > are > >> >>> looking for places to go to next that are nearby e.g. by train/bus. > >> >>> Somewhere like London would report Cambridge, Stonehenge or Oxford > as > >> >>> being nearby even though they are 60+ miles apart.. yet currently it > >> >>> only shows 8 districts in London. > >> >>> > >> >>> I imagine something like the in article Nearby pages that we > >> >>> currently have in beta would be a better vehicle for secondary > >> >>> points... > >> >>> > >> >>> Is there anyway we can guide a volunteer developer to do this and is > >> >>> anyone interested? I'd love to see this moved along and give WV the > >> >>> nearby it deserves. > >> >>> > >> >>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Max Semenik < > [email protected]> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Jon Robson <[email protected]> > >> >>> > wrote: > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> Actually my question is about further tweaking this... please > >> >>> >> reread my > >> >>> >> email. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > D'oh! > >> >>> > > >> >>> > So the problem is not in radius but in what to display. > >> >>> > > https://wikimedia.mingle.thoughtworks.com/projects/mobile/cards/784 > >> >>> > discusses how geo search can be made more useful for WV. Our > present > >> >>> > Nearby > >> >>> > implementation that searches for primary coordinaes only is not > >> >>> > helpful > >> >>> > because the wiki consists of large pages with a lot of POIs > around. > >> >>> > My > >> >>> > current work on porting to Elasticsearch would allow a sane > spatial > >> >>> > search > >> >>> > for secondary coordinates, once it's complete we can experiment > with > >> >>> > adding > >> >>> > a Wikiversity-specific mode for Nearby. With a lot of points > around, > >> >>> > there > >> >>> > should be no need to have a continent-sized radius. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> -- > >> >>> Jon Robson > >> >>> * http://jonrobson.me.uk > >> >>> * https://www.facebook.com/jonrobson > >> >>> * @rakugojon > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Jon Robson > >> > * http://jonrobson.me.uk > >> > * https://www.facebook.com/jonrobson > >> > * @rakugojon > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
