On Sep 9, 2014 12:31 PM, "Jon Robson" <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm the main opposition of a mobile only class. I've been opposing > many requests for it as I believe it isn't sustainable, it basically > means you maintain 2 copies of a page and also as a result you > increase the page load for mobile users by including desktop only > content in the HTML markup. I'm also keen in future to kill the > nomobile class but this is a long way off.
2 copies maintained is an option I considered but I had something else in mind. Hiding one way or another inline and maintaining only 1 copy. (Instead of the top level hiding we have now, we could hide (or show) smaller elements as needed. -Jeremy
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
