|
I wouldn't use it for any publicly facing websites that receives
general traffic. For applications it's just fine, especially if it's a
tool that has repeated use. Anything else, like an e-commerce site, is
probably a no-no. Ryan Nichols Apples To Oranges www.apples-to-oranges.com Yehuda Katz wrote: What would you guys say is the practical maximum size _javascript_ file you'd want to load with a page?At this point, I'd like to use: Mochikit (100k) Mochikit Scriptaculous Port (50k -- maybe a bit smaller if compressed) IE7 (30k) Is that too much? Won't it cause serious problems for visitors with dialup? Then again, doesn't a 100k file cause serious problems for visitors with dialup? I understand that the file gets cached after the first use, but even so, is it acceptable? I'd love some general feedback. |
- [mochikit] Re: Practical javascript size limit Ryan Nichols
- [mochikit] Re: Practical javascript size limit CraquerPro
- [mochikit] Re: Practical javascript size limit Eugene Lazutkin
- [mochikit] Re: Practical javascript size limit Bob Ippolito
- [mochikit] Re: Practical javascript size limit Kevin Dangoor
- [mochikit] Re: Practical javascript size limi... Bob Ippolito
- [mochikit] Re: Practical javascript size ... Yehuda Katz
- [mochikit] Re: Practical javascript ... Bob Ippolito
- [mochikit] Re: Practical javascr... Bob Ippolito
- [mochikit] Re: Practical jav... Yehuda Katz
- [mochikit] Re: Practical jav... CraquerPro
