On Apr 10, 2006, at 5:14 PM, Jeremy wrote:
> > Actually its not a MIT liscence its a "MIT-style license" which is > different and vague enough for our company lawyer to not allow us to > use it. Your company's lawyer is lazy or just bad at what he does. Tell him to do his job and read the license! It's word for word identical to any other MIT license aside from the year and copyright holders. > Will the new code be released under the same liscence as the rest of > the Mochikit stuff? Yes, but some of it is still going to be a derivative work of scriptaculous (though I can't imagine much actual code is left over after reworking it). -bob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
