Bob Ippolito wrote: > On Apr 10, 2006, at 5:14 PM, Jeremy wrote: >>Actually its not a MIT liscence its a "MIT-style license" which is >>different and vague enough for our company lawyer to not allow us to >>use it. > > Your company's lawyer is lazy or just bad at what he does. Tell him > to do his job and read the license! It's word for word identical to > any other MIT license aside from the year and copyright holders.
For what is the defacto official text, for comparison: http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
