> information is basic and if the information is wrong... better dont > have the info
Information is a the level of the question. Launching posts every two seconds with caps words and '!!' won't help you to get good anwsers. > i think if all we wanna make of this library compete with prototype, > mochikit developers have not only to emulate or copy prototype > functionallity (as with visual effects module in mochikit) you have to > be better than it! We don't copy anything. scriptaculous has done a great work on the compatibility field, so we ported it. It's a work in progress, there's still no MochiKit release with this code. You can use it if you're a developper and if you're likely to help. Quick opinions like 'Be better ! You should work more' won't make us go anywhere. And there's no point to compare with prototype as it's not the same work, that's all. > i think prototype with visual effects "extensions" (rico / > scriptaculous) are best option for production applications for now If you had started by that... DISCLAIMER: don't use Visual Effects in any application if you're not willing to see things break and api changes. It will be marked as stable when MochiKit 1.4 will be released. Finally, I remember you there are mainly voluntary developpers here. I'm not paid to code on MochiKit, and I'm not paid to answer your questions. If you're not happy with MochiKit, and are not ready to help, please go away. -- Thomas --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
