On May 17, 2006, at 4:28 PM, Jose R wrote:

> information is basic and if the information is wrong... better dont
> have the info
> i think if all we wanna make of this library compete with prototype,
> mochikit developers have not only to emulate or copy prototype
> functionallity (as with visual effects module in mochikit) you have to
> be better than it!

I think you miss what really makes MochiKit stand out from other  
Javascript frameworks.

> i think prototype with visual effects "extensions" (rico /
> scriptaculous) are best option for production applications for now

I think frameworks with tests and documentation trump any pretty  
clicky-flashy out there.

Zac


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MochiKit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to