On 5/17/06, Jose R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But try prototype first (another great javascript library at > http://prototype.conio.net) wich i think is a well tested and has even > IRC channel wehere you can ask for someone to help you... you wont get > a "read documentation" as answer
Of course not. There *is* no documentation for Prototype. (Or, at least, not on the Prototype site!) > Mochikit has a lot to evolve My opinion is that having the MochiKit trunk documentation on the website is a bug and not a feature. Providing people with the right docs for the version of software they're using is something I've fought with for TurboGears and progress is being made on a good solution that's usable by everyone who wants to contribute docs to the project. I might suggest putting up the tagged version of the docs and linking to the current released version. (The trunk version can be there somewhere as well...) MochiKit *is* a well-tested, extensively documented, cleanly written JavaScript framework. And don't underestimate the "cleanly written" aspect, because MochiKit plays well with most other JavaScript libraries because of the way it's constructed. It is true that Scriptaculous offers nice visuals that MochiKit doesn't today... but, as you've seen from the docs, that's coming soon. I do think you've hit on a bug for beginners, but it's a fairly easily correctable bug. Kevin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
