Hmmm... 2006/8/16, Daniel Haus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > But still, as a customer, I would not choose a company that ships > development versions over one that builds on versions marked as stable. > I know and see that MochiKit is high quality software, even the > development versions, and I'm very happy with it, but a version with an > official "stable"-sticker would make me feel much safer.
So if the dev feels the product is stable enough, and has tested the product to be stable to their needs, then mark it at stable. Just say you're using XKit based on MochiKit 1.4-dev, put a sticker on it saying it's stable, but you don't need to tell them how many changes you needed to make. Yeah I know forking is generally a Bad Thing (TM), but you're not forking, and then making a whole new product. You're just trying to make a few bucks from some company, and can throw out the fork when you're done. Especially when patches from your fork get sent upstream, and uploaded to SVN on a regular basis. Other companies lie when they say their software is "stable" when it clearly isn't. I suppose taking software that is far more stable than their crap, and also calling it stable isn't nearly as bad. Just my €0.02. Cheers, Yaakov --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
