Per Cederberg schrieb:
 > Yes, well. I was thinking simpler is better. So I though a single flag
 > would be sufficient to either remove both padding and borders, or to
 > keep the values unchanged (as today). If someone wants more detail,
 > there is always the helper functions for retrieving padding and border
 > widths.

Ok, I agree a single parameter with default set for the current behavior 
is best. Let me know which you prefer of innerWidth=False or 
withBorder=True or extend=2 (where extend can be 0, 1, 2, 3 for inner, 
with padding, border, margin).

 > I was kind of thinking to include those first in version 1.5, but now
 > that they seem important in order to fix this bug I think we might as
 > well include them in 1.4. Need to create some good test cases for all
 > of this though. And docs. Feel free to fix these issues if you have
 > time during the weekend. I'll let you know if I commit anything to svn
 > related to this.

Ok. You are referring to http://trac.mochikit.com/ticket/84 here, right? 
Btw, I think the name getPaddingBox suggested there for getting only the 
padding is misleading; I would think that getPaddingBox should return 
getElementDimensinos(extend=1) as discussed above.

-- Chris

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MochiKit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to