Well, it is a Web application and I know that hitting the Web server manually (using telnet to port 80) is so much faster than the alleged 2.0 seconds response time I get with Siege.
So, the question remains: Why am I seeing relatively faster responses with less processes?? Noor On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:36 AM, Jason wrote: > Way too involved of a question for this list :) > > I'd suspect that your application is fairly heavy judging from avg response > times and that if you ran it from a script without involving fastcgi or > apache you'd see similar throughput. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Mod-fcgid-users mailing list Mod-fcgid-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mod-fcgid-users
