Well, it is a Web application and I know that hitting the Web server
manually (using telnet to port 80) is so much faster than the alleged
2.0 seconds response time I get with Siege.

So, the question remains: Why am I seeing relatively faster responses
with less processes??


On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:36 AM, Jason wrote:
> Way too involved of a question for this list :)
> I'd suspect that your application is fairly heavy judging from avg response
> times and that if you ran it from a script without involving fastcgi or
> apache you'd see similar throughput.

Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
Mod-fcgid-users mailing list

Reply via email to