Way too involved of a question for this list :)

I'd suspect that your application is fairly heavy judging from avg response
times and that if you ran it from a script without involving fastcgi or
apache you'd see similar throughput.



On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Noor <mlist-fc...@orientalsensation.com>wrote:

> Hello list.
>
> (I hope I'm posting to the right mailing list. If not, then I
> apologize already and ask you to direct me to the right list. Thanks!)
>
> I've setup the following configuration on a Dell 2940 2 x Quad-Core
> with 4GB RAM:
>
> - FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE amd64 bit. Kernel recompiled with minimal
> options, no optimizations done.
> - /etc/sysctl.conf includes: kern.ipc.shmmax=134217728,
> kern.ipc.semvmx=131068
> - Apache worker-MPM V2.2.11_7 from ports -- required modules active
> only, no optimizations done.
> - mod_fcgid V2.2 from ports, no optimizations done.
> - PHP 5.2.10, compiled from source with options to activate FastCGI.
> - eAccelerator 0.9.5.3, compiled from source with options to activate
> shared memory.
>
> Now, I've been testing load using siege and I'm either not
> understanding the whole concept of processes/threads of Apache (and
> fcgid's processes) or every other documentation and tip I found on the
> Internet is irrelevant! I will detail next:
>
> Siege configuration:
> ------------------------------------
> version: 2.66
> verbose: false
> debug: true
> protocol: HTTP/1.1
> connection: close
> concurrent users: 100
> time to run: n/a
> repetitions: 50
> socket timeout:  30
> delay: 1 sec
> internet simulation: false
> benchmark mode: false
> failures until abort: 1024
> named URL: none
> URLs file: /usr/local/etc/urls.txt
> logging: true
> log file: /var/log/siege.log
> resource file: /root/.siegerc
> allow redirects: true
> allow zero byte data: true
> allow chunked encoding: true
>
> Base httpd.conf include the following settings:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ServerLimit: 64
> ThreadLimit: 128
> MaxClients: 1024
>
> The following 3 snippets detail loads I've done with siege.
> For all tests, I've setup eAccelerator (compiled from source with
> shared-memory enabled) with 32MB of mem_only optimization.
> Parameters I've setup for siege are detailed before the (+++) signs,
> results after them:
>
> StartServers 4
> ThreadsPerChild 64
> MinSpareThreads 32
> MaxSpareThreads 64
> MaxProcessCount 8
> DefaultMaxClassProcessCount 8
> DefaultMinClassProcessCount 0
> ++++++++++++++++++++
> ransactions: 5092 hits
> Availability: 99.98 %
> Elapsed time: 170.01 secs
> Data transferred: 78.40 MB
> Response time: 2.46 secs
> Transaction rate: 29.95 trans/sec
> Throughput: 0.46 MB/sec
> Concurrency: 73.78
> Successful transactions: 4720
> Failed transactions: 1
> Longest transaction: 27.70
> Shortest transaction: 0.05
>
> StartServers 4
> ThreadsPerChild 64
> MinSpareThreads 32
> MaxSpareThreads 64
> MaxProcessCount 16
> DefaultMaxClassProcessCount 16
> DefaultMinClassProcessCount 0
> ++++++++++++++++++++
> ransactions: 5091 hits
> Availability: 99.96 %
> Elapsed time: 242.89 secs
> Data transferred: 78.38 MB
> Response time: 3.75 secs
> Transaction rate: 20.96 trans/sec
> Throughput: 0.32 MB/sec
> Concurrency: 78.70
> Successful transactions: 4719
> Failed transactions: 2
> Longest transaction: 26.10
> Shortest transaction: 0.06
>
> StartServers 4
> ThreadsPerChild 64
> MinSpareThreads 32
> MaxSpareThreads 64
> MaxProcessCount 128
> DefaultMaxClassProcessCount 64
> DefaultMinClassProcessCount 0
> ++++++++++++++++++++
> ransactions: 5067 hits
> Availability: 99.49 %
> Elapsed time: 322.76 secs
> Data transferred: 78.11 MB
> Response time: 5.31 secs
> Transaction rate: 15.70 trans/sec
> Throughput: 0.24 MB/sec
> Concurrency: 83.30
> Successful transactions: 4695
> Failed transactions: 26
> Longest transaction: 29.34
> Shortest transaction: 0.10
>
> According to these findings, the best benchmark is when
> MaxProcessCount is set to 8 (which is number of CPU's). Is this just
> an accident? According to so many tips and pages I read on the
> Internet (and even its default value,) this variable should be around
> 100. If you notice the last benchmark, when I put 64 in this variable,
> I got 26 failed transactions. While when I put only 8 working
> processes, I got no failures and the benchmark had the best times and
> records!
>
> Anyone please care to explain why this is happening?
>
> And while you're at it, I'll through in another question: How does
> eAccelerator/FastCGI manage the shared memory segments? According to
> eAccelerator's homepage, it'll share such segments when the spawning
> process is shared. In the case of FastCGI (mod_fcgid), *who* is the
> spawning process? And this spawning process, how many cgi-php
> processes it'll spawn? (which if I understand correctly, such cgi-php
> processes would share eAccelerator's cached scripts as they've got one
> "father").
>
> Kindly, someone knowledgeable with all these technologies care to
> explain and shed more light, for me and for others maybe...
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Noor
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus
> on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> Mod-fcgid-users mailing list
> Mod-fcgid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mod-fcgid-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Mod-fcgid-users mailing list
Mod-fcgid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mod-fcgid-users

Reply via email to