For what it's worth, I like the sound of it. I definitely see why people would have a problem with it, but as Denny said, the same would apply for generated controllers, and so on... If you're using event generation, you're either sticking with the generated organization or reorganizing stuff anyway...
</$0.02> Adam On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 9:52 PM, denstar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Brian Kotek wrote: > > I was actually focusing on your inclusion of the event generation code in > > this request, not really the scaffolding since I don't use it. That's why > I > > was saying it would be difficult to do: if I generate an event called > > "user.list" via the URL, it could be rather dangerous to assume that I > want > > a MG XML file named "user.xml" or something. I might not want to call it > > that, or I might already have an XML file that contains user stuff that > is > > named "admin.xml" that does lots of admin-related things for users plus > > more, or I might have the file in my own location > > (config/includes/user.xml), or I might not want it in a separate XML file > at > > all. > > Could we not just make the same assumptions about the config files > that we do about the controller files? > > Don't the same problems apply? > > It's a lot easier to go from separate organized files into one file, > than the other way around, in my opinion. > > When I get around to creating a patch for MG3, I'll send it to you, > and I bet you'll end up liking things better separated. I don't think > it's related to personal style so much. > > Then there would be two voices, and we could get more, and more, and > eventually... > > Or maybe it will just strike someone who has direct power as a good idea. > :] > > I'll eventually do it for myself again, so it'll be somewhere if > someone else needs it, regardless. > > :Denny > > PS- I haven't done it for events yet, obviously, so maybe that idea > won't fly, but it's swell for scaffolds. > > -- > I wonder if most people ever ask themselves why love is connected with > reproduction. And if they do ask themselves about this, I wonder what > answer they give. > Mortimer Adler > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "model-glue" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/model-glue?hl=en For more about Model-Glue, check http://www.model-glue.com . -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
