Why not have a config flag that allows the developer to choose between single scaffold and event xml files, and splitting them up based upon a convention? Would be cool to see MG3 support both. (My peanut gallery comment...)
Paul On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Adam Tuttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For what it's worth, I like the sound of it. I definitely see why people > would have a problem with it, but as Denny said, the same would apply for > generated controllers, and so on... If you're using event generation, you're > either sticking with the generated organization or reorganizing stuff > anyway... > > </$0.02> > > Adam > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 9:52 PM, denstar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Brian Kotek wrote: >> > I was actually focusing on your inclusion of the event generation code >> in >> > this request, not really the scaffolding since I don't use it. That's >> why I >> > was saying it would be difficult to do: if I generate an event called >> > "user.list" via the URL, it could be rather dangerous to assume that I >> want >> > a MG XML file named "user.xml" or something. I might not want to call it >> > that, or I might already have an XML file that contains user stuff that >> is >> > named "admin.xml" that does lots of admin-related things for users plus >> > more, or I might have the file in my own location >> > (config/includes/user.xml), or I might not want it in a separate XML >> file at >> > all. >> >> Could we not just make the same assumptions about the config files >> that we do about the controller files? >> >> Don't the same problems apply? >> >> It's a lot easier to go from separate organized files into one file, >> than the other way around, in my opinion. >> >> When I get around to creating a patch for MG3, I'll send it to you, >> and I bet you'll end up liking things better separated. I don't think >> it's related to personal style so much. >> >> Then there would be two voices, and we could get more, and more, and >> eventually... >> >> Or maybe it will just strike someone who has direct power as a good idea. >> :] >> >> I'll eventually do it for myself again, so it'll be somewhere if >> someone else needs it, regardless. >> >> :Denny >> >> PS- I haven't done it for events yet, obviously, so maybe that idea >> won't fly, but it's swell for scaffolds. >> >> -- >> I wonder if most people ever ask themselves why love is connected with >> reproduction. And if they do ask themselves about this, I wonder what >> answer they give. >> Mortimer Adler >> >> >> > > > > -- Paul Marcotte Fancy Bread - in the heart or in the head? http://www.fancybread.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "model-glue" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/model-glue?hl=en For more about Model-Glue, check http://www.model-glue.com . -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
