On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:44 AM, spills <[email protected]> wrote: > I am interested in your project though in the standpoint to see the > performance aspect of all 3 of the mentioned framewoks. Didn't the > Litepost project do this already?
Litepost used an old version of Mach-II and Model-Glue but also had a Fusebox version - and now has a FW/1 version as well. With Flex in the mix you need to write a well-structured app that uses a service layer - at which point wrapping an HTML / AJAX UI on top with any of the MVC frameworks is about the same. ColdBox uses conventions (as does Fusebox 5.5 if you take the no-XML option), Mach-II and Model-Glue use XML to describe the event mapping. It's really one of those questions with no one right answer (and no wrong answer either). Use whichever framework you prefer - or your client prefers (I've had clients with a strong preference, sometimes). -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN Railo Technologies US -- http://getrailo.com/ An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Model-Glue Sites: Home Page: http://www.model-glue.com Documentation: http://docs.model-glue.com Bug Tracker: http://bugs.model-glue.com Blog: http://www.model-glue.com/blog You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "model-glue" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/model-glue?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
