Hi Aleksander, Il giorno lun 13 lug 2020 alle ore 10:08 Aleksander Morgado <aleksan...@aleksander.es> ha scritto: > > Hey! > > > > > This particular device has a second port configuration (1bc7:1102), > > > > which which looks like this: > > > > > > > > /: Bus 01.Port 1: Dev 1, Class=root_hub, Driver=atmel-ehci/3p, 480M > > > > |__ Port 2: Dev 7, If 0, Class=Vendor Specific Class, > > > > Driver=option, 480M > > > > |__ Port 2: Dev 7, If 1, Class=Vendor Specific Class, > > > > Driver=option, 480M > > > > |__ Port 2: Dev 7, If 2, Class=Vendor Specific Class, > > > > Driver=option, 480M > > > > |__ Port 2: Dev 7, If 3, Class=Communications, Driver=cdc_ether, > > > > 480M > > > > |__ Port 2: Dev 7, If 4, Class=CDC Data, Driver=cdc_ether, 480M > > > > > > > > I've not been able to get the cdc_ether portion working yet, although > > > > I am hopeful. If both ECM and "option" serial interfaces are > > > > available, how does ModemManager choose between them? > > > > > > MM doesn't have any implementation yet to handle ECM interfaces in > > > Telit modems, but that would definitely be preferred over PPP in a > > > TTY. > > > > > > > Not sure that ECM is better than PPP for this modem, since > > connection/disconnection requires a reboot of the modem. > > > > Oh why is that? Is that a limitation of the modem firmware? Not sure I > understood that. >
Yes, this is by firmware design. Regards, Daniele > -- > Aleksander > https://aleksander.es _______________________________________________ ModemManager-devel mailing list ModemManager-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/modemmanager-devel
