Hey, On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 5:52 PM Frederic Martinsons <frederic.martins...@sigfox.com> wrote: > > Last try of the day, I built a ModemManager with WITH_NEWEST_QMI_COMMANDS > enable and things goes pretty well since I got lot of more update than before > (see log joined) > > Looking at the code implied, this is expected because there are more > thresholds and they have better granularity ({ -100, -97, -95, -92, -90, -85, > -80, -75, -70, -65 }) >
Yep. > Anyway, all of that seems to behave as expected (considering signal > thresholds configured), maybe I just have to review the need for my > application to have an "up to date" (whatever it means) signal quality > information. > > One last question though, what is the drawbacks of using newest QMI commands > ? Is this is experimental ? What I risk if I choose to use it (since my > system must support a large variety of modem type and not just the EC25 one) > ? There are setups out there that have been using this for a very long time, so I wouldn't call it experimental. I rarely, if ever, test with this code path, truth be told. What we need to do is combine both together; i.e. use the newest commands by default and fallback to the old ones if any error is seen with the newest ones. -- Aleksander https://aleksander.es