> From: "norske ho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > a) can you base this argument on how they looked? "long
> hair, no
> > shirt"? i don't think the Beatles looked "cool" half the
> time,
> > but that didn't affect the quality of the music they put
> out.
> > b) i was under the impression we were talking about
> opinions,
> > not facts. i.e., you think Zeppelin sucks, most ppl don't.
> > and if i think they do fall into the same category as the
> > Beatles than they do, in my mind, and if they don't in
> yours, so
> > be it. but you can't define that for other ppl.
>
> no, but there isn't a way to get you to see that the beatles
> and led zeppelin in no way sound the same.
WAIT! when did I EVER say that these 2 bands sound the same???
never, that's when! all i said was that the way a musician looks
has no bearing on the sound/quality of the music. i know i said
i like them both, but i never said it was because they sound the same.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail � Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
